industrialincentivesguide

A West Michigan developer's guide to industrial incentives in 2026

March 20, 2026 · Max Benedict · 8 min read

Max Benedict

Max Benedict

Director of Development at Third Coast Development. Leads industrial build-to-suit and capital structuring.

Most write-ups of Michigan’s economic development incentives read like they were drafted by an agency communications team. They are not wrong, exactly, but they leave out the part where you, the developer or the CFO of the corporate user, have to actually decide which programs to pursue, in what order, and on what timeline. This is the version that’s missing from the public web — what we actually look at when a project lands on our desk and the question is whether the incentive stack can make the numbers work.

By way of context: Third Coast has secured more than $80M in cumulative incentives across our portfolio, and roughly every industrial project we’ve delivered has had at least one of the tools below in the capital plan. That’s not a brag — it’s how the math works in Michigan. Projects that pencil on construction cost and rent alone are increasingly rare. Incentive structuring is core to the financial engineering, not a bonus on top.

Why incentive structuring matters

Two reasons. First, on a project of any meaningful size, the difference between a deal that closes and one that doesn’t is usually a few hundred basis points of yield — and the right incentive package, properly layered, can move that yield in exactly that range. Second, incentives are time-bound and politically variable. Programs that exist today may not exist in three years, and programs that exist on paper may not be funded in any given year. A developer who treats incentives as a project-by-project optimization will out-execute one who treats them as an afterthought. The order matters: site control first, then due diligence, then incentive strategy in parallel with the financing conversation.

Industrial Facilities Tax exemption (Public Act 198)

The IFT is the workhorse of Michigan industrial incentives, and it’s where every serious industrial development conversation starts. The structure: a local government designates an Industrial Development District (IDD), and the developer or owner applies for a certificate that reduces the property tax liability on qualifying new industrial construction (or rehabilitation of existing industrial facilities) for a defined term.

The mechanics: the abatement applies to the new real and/or personal property associated with the industrial use, and the local jurisdiction sets the term — typically up to twelve years for new construction. The state’s portion of school operating taxes is also affected. The effective benefit varies meaningfully by jurisdiction and by the millage profile of the property.

The application process runs through the local unit of government first (city council or township board), then to the State Tax Commission for final approval. Public hearings are required. The common mistakes: starting construction before the IDD is in place or before the certificate is applied for, which can disqualify a project from full benefit; and underestimating the political conversation in jurisdictions where industrial development is contested. Treat the local approval as a real campaign, not a paperwork exercise.

Brownfield TIF

For any site with environmental conditions, demolition needs, or significant site preparation costs, Michigan’s Brownfield Redevelopment Financing Act is one of the most valuable tools available — and one of the most misunderstood.

The mechanic is tax increment financing. The base value of the property is captured for the existing taxing jurisdictions, and the increment (the increase in tax revenue created by the redevelopment) is captured for a defined period and used to reimburse eligible activities. “Eligible activities” is the term to focus on: environmental assessment and remediation, lead and asbestos abatement, demolition, site preparation, and infrastructure improvements all qualify on contaminated or functionally obsolete sites. On certain projects, broader categories may be reimbursable through the MEDC’s Act 381 work plan approval.

The structure involves a local Brownfield Redevelopment Authority approving a Brownfield Plan, and — for projects seeking school tax capture or other state-level benefits — MEDC approval of an Act 381 work plan. Timeline: realistically 4-9 months from the start of plan drafting to local and state approval, depending on complexity and the project’s relationship with the local BRA.

We’ve used brownfield TIF on projects like the 320 Hall Street SE redevelopment of the former Benteler Automotive plant, where the existing site conditions required significant remediation and demolition work that wouldn’t have been economic on its own. Brownfield is what lets adaptive reuse and contaminated-site redevelopment compete with greenfield construction on cost. Without it, a lot of the most important urban industrial sites in West Michigan wouldn’t get redeveloped at all.

MEDC performance grants

The Michigan Economic Development Corporation administers a portfolio of performance-based grant programs — meaning the funds are awarded against measurable commitments (capital investment, job creation, wages) and disbursed on performance. The three you’re most likely to encounter on an industrial project:

Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) — federally funded, administered through MEDC, used for infrastructure improvements, site preparation, and other community development purposes tied to job creation in eligible communities.

Michigan Business Development Program (MBDP) — performance-based grants, loans, or other economic assistance tied to a specific business expansion or location decision with measurable job and investment commitments.

Jobs Creation Fund / strategic site readiness programs — programs that have evolved over the past several years to support site preparation and infrastructure readiness for large-scale industrial projects.

These are competitive programs. You don’t apply and receive; you make a case and negotiate. The case is built around the counterfactual: what does the project look like without the grant, what does it look like with the grant, and why is the difference meaningful to the State’s economic development objectives. The MEDC team is professional and works in good faith; they’re also responding to a policy environment, and the projects that align with current strategic priorities (advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, EV supply chain, mobility) tend to get a fuller hearing than projects that don’t.

Reimbursement is performance-tied: hit your investment and job creation commitments per the milestone schedule, and the funds disburse. Miss the commitments, and the structure includes clawback provisions. Plan accordingly.

OPRA / Public Act 146

The Obsolete Property Rehabilitation Act is less talked about because it doesn’t apply to the typical greenfield industrial project — but for any developer working on adaptive reuse, infill commercial, or downtown rehabilitation, OPRA is essential. The mechanic: a local unit of government can grant an exemption that effectively freezes the property tax on the rehabilitated value of an obsolete property for up to twelve years, capturing the increment over the base value to encourage redevelopment that wouldn’t otherwise be economic.

OPRA is heavily used for commercial corridor rehabilitation and downtown mixed-use. For industrial users considering an adaptive reuse of an older facility, it’s worth a conversation early.

LIHTC for multifamily

A quick note for completeness, since our portfolio also includes substantial multifamily development: Low-Income Housing Tax Credits are the primary federal tool for income-restricted multifamily development, allocated through the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA). 9% credits are competitive and high-value; 4% credits paired with tax-exempt bond financing are non-competitive but still subject to MSHDA review. The structuring complexity is real, and LIHTC deals require a different kind of specialized expertise than industrial. See our multifamily capability page for more on how we approach those projects.

How we structure the stack

The order of operations is almost always the same: site control, then due diligence, then a parallel pursuit of (a) the financing structure and (b) the incentive package. The incentive package gets layered into the financing structure as terms get firm, not the other way around — you don’t design the project to fit a hoped-for grant; you design the project to be excellent on its own terms, and the right incentives find their way in.

The sequencing question we get most often is whether to lead with IFT or brownfield. The honest answer: it depends on the site. Clean greenfield with no environmental conditions: IFT is the only relevant tool, and you start there. Contaminated or functionally obsolete site: brownfield comes first, because the eligible activity reimbursements affect site preparation cost, which affects the project budget, which affects everything downstream. Most large industrial projects in the older West Michigan submarkets are going to involve some combination of both.

The other principle: don’t promise the tenant or the lender an incentive package you haven’t actually secured. Generic language about “pursuing all available incentives” is fine in early conversation. Specific numbers — abatement percentages, grant amounts, TIF capture periods — should only show up in deal documents once the local and state approvals are in hand. Overcommitting is how developers lose deals or worse, get the deals to close and then can’t deliver on the economics.


The incentive landscape in Michigan is one of the things that makes West Michigan an attractive place to develop. The programs work, the agencies are competent, and the local governments — Kentwood, Grand Rapids, Walker, Wyoming, Cascade — generally know what they’re doing when industrial users come knocking. The work is in matching the right tools to the specific project.

If you’re scoping a build-to-suit or considering a Michigan site selection and want to talk through the incentive picture, get in touch. And for more on how we approach industrial development overall, see our industrial build-to-suit capability page.

Written by

Max Benedict

Max Benedict

Director of Development at Third Coast Development. Leads industrial build-to-suit and capital structuring.

Have a project in mind? Let’s talk.